Indirect evidence, also known as circumstantial evidence, is a type of proof that doesn't directly prove a fact but suggests its likelihood through inference. For example, if you find an umbrella at the scene of an event and it was raining, you might infer that someone left it there because they were caught in the rain. This is not definitive proof, but it supports the possibility.

Unlike direct evidence, which proves something outright (like a witness seeing an event happen), indirect evidence requires interpretation. It’s like putting together pieces of a puzzle to form a bigger picture. While it can be powerful in building a case, it needs to be supported by other forms of evidence to establish facts conclusively.

In court, indirect evidence often plays a crucial role in determining guilt or innocence. However, it must be handled carefully to avoid wrongful convictions. Legal professionals weigh it alongside other information to ensure fairness and accuracy. So, while indirect evidence isn’t the smoking gun, it’s still an important tool in uncovering the truth ???